Why does the United Nations need real reform By Samayxpatel | August 2025
Written by Samai Patel
Written by Samai Patel
The United Nations was established after the Second World War to preserve peace and security, but after about 80 years, the question remains: Is it still working? The answer is not simple. While the United Nations plays a decisive role in humanitarian aid, health programs and peacekeeping tasks, they are The decision -making structure is very defectiveAnd it hinders the world.
The biggest problem lies in United Nations Security Council. Five permanent members, the United States, Russia, China, France, and the United Kingdom, carry the power of veto, which means that any of them can prevent a decision, Even if the majority of the world supports it. This defect in force often leads to Gridlock, as urgent crises are not answered due to political competitions.
Take Syria, for example. Repeated cassation by Russia and China a meaningful act against atrocities, leaving millions who fell into the crossing. Or consider climate change, a issue that affects every nation but is still marginalized in favor of the conflicts of geopolitical power. The design of the United Nations reflects a global system of the 1940s, not today’s facts.
Critics argue that United Nations reform will be impossible, but the cost of inaction is higher. Without changing, the United Nations risk becoming unrelated, a stage of speeches instead of solutions. The expansion of the Security Council to include more votes, especially from Africa, Latin America and South Asia, reflects better the world in which we live now. It can prevent reduction or rethinking the power of veto (veto “from one country from the hostage of the world in times of crisis.
The truth is that the United Nations mission is still a task. From fighting global poverty to coordination of relief in disasters, its work saves lives every day. But if the organization is not able to adapt, it will lose the credibility it needs to lead. United Nations reform is not related to its tearing; It is about making it strong enough to deal with the challenges of the twenty -first century.
In the end, the question is not whether the United Nations is required; that it. The real question is whether it will develop enough quickly to stay relevant. Without reform, the United Nations risk becoming a symbol of what could be instead of what should be.
Get to know me more:
Post Comment